Brunswick County, North Carolina: local government websites
Automated testing detected at least one failure against WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA success criteria on 2 of the 3 Brunswick County, North Carolina, local government websites tested (67%).
- Websites tested
- 3
- With at least one detected failure
- 2
- Median detected failures per website
- 20
- Pages tested
- 146
Entities tested
| Entity | Type | Scan date | Failures detected |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of Boiling Spring Lakes | Municipality | October 20, 2026 | 0 |
| Town of Oak Island | Municipality | October 20, 2026 | 20 |
| Town of St. James | Municipality | October 20, 2026 | 75 |
Most frequently detected success criteria
| Success criterion | Level | Websites with at least one failure |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.1 Non-text Content | A | 2 (67%) |
| 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) | AA | 2 (67%) |
| 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) | A | 2 (67%) |
| 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value | A | 2 (67%) |
Scope and limitations
What this report is
This is an automated conformance test of publicly accessible pages on each listed entity's website, measured against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, Level A and Level AA success criteria. It was produced on October 20, 2026 using axe-core 4.14.0, testing 146 pages.
What this report is not
This report does not determine whether each listed entity satisfies any legal obligation. Legal determinations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or any other statute or regulation are for your legal counsel, not for an automated test, and nothing in this document should be read as a legal opinion or as advice.
Automated testing identifies a subset of accessibility barriers. Published estimates of automated coverage range from roughly 20% to 57% of issues depending on methodology and the site being tested. Categories of barrier that automated testing cannot reliably detect include, among others:
- whether alternative text is meaningful rather than merely present
- keyboard traps and illogical focus order
- whether content is usable and comprehensible with a screen reader
- accuracy and synchronization of captions and audio description
- accessibility of linked PDFs and other documents
- whether an accessible alternative conveys equivalent information
A site with zero findings in this report may still present significant barriers to users with disabilities. Manual testing and testing with assistive technology by people with disabilities are necessary to assess a site's actual usability, and no automated test substitutes for them.
No findings are a guarantee of anything. This report describes what an automated test detected on specific pages on a specific date. Website content changes continuously.